Introduction
Mumbai, India – A new Bollywood debate is heating up online. Actor Emraan Hashmi has publicly thrown his support behind the Ranveer Singh blockbuster ‘Dhurandhar’. Hashmi made strong comments in a recent interview. He defended the big-budget spy drama against its vocal critics. He labeled the negative reaction a ‘crap mentality’. This declaration is surprising to many fans. Hashmi admitted he has not yet watched the film himself. His stance highlights a growing divide between some industry insiders and film reviewers. It shows the powerful solidarity actors sometimes show for their colleagues’ work, regardless of personal viewing.
What Did Emraan Hashmi Say Exactly?
Emraan Hashmi did not hold back his opinion. He called the criticism aimed at ‘Dhurandhar’ unfair and predictable. He used the phrase ‘crap mentality’ to describe the mindset of certain critics. Hashmi argued that audiences should form their own opinions. He believes people should not blindly follow negative reviews. His defense is rooted in respect for the hard work of the film’s team. He emphasized the effort put in by Ranveer Singh, the director, and the entire crew over many years.
Why Is He Defending a Film He Hasn’t Seen?
This is the central point of the debate. Hashmi is defending the principle behind the film’s creation. He is standing against what he sees as a trend of harsh, dismissive criticism. He trusts the talent and dedication of his fellow actor, Ranveer Singh, and the director. His support is for the people involved, not necessarily the final product’s every detail. This type of industry solidarity is common in Bollywood, where personal relationships and professional respect often influence public statements.
What is the Movie ‘Dhurandhar’ About?
‘Dhurandhar’ is a major Bollywood spy action thriller. It stars Ranveer Singh in the lead role. The plot follows a rugged undercover agent on a dangerous national mission. The film features high-octane stunts, international locations, and a patriotic theme. It was one of the most expensive Indian films made this year. It released to huge box office numbers but also faced mixed and sometimes very negative reviews from several top critics.
How Have Critics Responded to the Film?
Many film critics have panned ‘Dhurandhar’. Common complaints cite a weak storyline and excessive length. Some reviews called the action sequences repetitive. Others criticized the film’s loud and simplistic approach to patriotism. This critical reception created a gap between reviewer scores and strong audience turnout. The debate now centers on whose opinion matters more: the paid critics or the paying public who flocked to theaters.
What Has Been the Public Reaction to Hashmi’s Comments?
Social media reactions are sharply divided. Many fans of Ranveer Singh and general moviegoers applaud Hashmi. They agree that critics are often too negative. Others find Hashmi’s comments irresponsible. They argue you cannot defend a movie you have not seen. The hashtag #DhurandharDebate is trending. It is full of memes, opinions, and discussions about film criticism, star power, and audience choice in modern Bollywood.
What Does This Reveal About Bollywood Today?
This incident reveals the tense relationship between filmmakers and media critics. It shows the pressure on big stars to deliver successful films. It also highlights the power of fan armies on social media. The ‘us versus them’ narrative is strong. The debate asks a bigger question: In the age of direct audience connection via streaming and social media, what is the true role and influence of the traditional film critic?
What Happens Next in This Debate?
The conversation will likely continue until the next major film release shifts attention. Ranveer Singh has not yet publicly responded to Hashmi’s support. The directors and producers of ‘Dhurandhar’ may thank him. Critics will probably write more about the film’s merits and flaws. Ultimately, the film’s long-term box office total will be the final verdict. This public clash ensures ‘Dhurandhar’ will remain in the news, keeping both the movie and the debate about it alive.

