Introduction

The Trump administration has released an official list. The list names 66 international groups the United States plans to leave or has already left. These organizations focus on a wide range of global issues. Key areas include climate change, labor rights, migration, and human rights. Former President Trump has often called these groups “woke” or “globalist.” He argues they work against American interests and sovereignty.

This move represents a major shift in US foreign policy. It follows the “America First” doctrine that defined Trump’s first term. The strategy involves pulling back from multilateral agreements. The goal is to avoid rules set by foreign bodies. Supporters say it saves money and protects national independence. Critics warn it isolates the US and weakens its global leadership on critical challenges.

The Scope of the Withdrawal Strategy

The list of 66 organizations is extensive. It includes well-known United Nations agencies and smaller technical bodies. Some withdrawals are already complete. Others are in the formal notification process. The Trump administration is targeting groups where US membership is voluntary or involves regular financial contributions. The plan signals a preference for bilateral deals over complex multilateral systems. It emphasizes direct nation-to-nation negotiations.

Climate and Environment Groups Take a Major Hit

A significant number of targeted organizations work on climate and the environment. The most famous is the Paris Agreement on climate change. The US officially left this pact in 2020. Other targets include the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The list also names groups focused on biodiversity, clean energy, and ocean health. This mass exit signals a rejection of the global scientific consensus on climate action. It prioritizes domestic fossil fuel industries over international carbon reduction goals.

Exiting Labor and Human Rights Frameworks

The administration is also leaving key labor and human rights bodies. This includes conventions from the International Labour Organization (ILO). These conventions set global standards for worker safety, child labor, and collective bargaining. The US will also withdraw from parts of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). Trump has long criticized the council for what he calls an anti-Israel bias. Critics argue the moves undermine America’s moral authority to advocate for human rights abroad.

Stepping Back from Migration and Refugee Pacts

Global agreements on migration are another major target. The US is formally withdrawing from the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. This non-binding pact aims to improve cooperation on international migration. The administration argues it could limit US control over its own border policies. The US is also stepping back from several refugee-focused UN agencies. This includes reducing funding and participation in the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

The “Woke” Label and the Administration’s Reasoning

The Trump administration frequently uses the term “woke” to describe these organizations. In this context, “woke” means promoting liberal or progressive values seen as opposing traditional American interests. Officials argue the groups are inefficient, expensive, and hostile to US policies. They say the organizations often push for wealth redistribution from rich to poor nations. The administration prefers alliances based on shared immediate security or economic interests, not shared values.

The Potential Consequences for US Influence

Foreign policy experts are deeply concerned about the long-term impact. Leaving 66 organizations creates a power vacuum. Other nations, like China and Russia, are eager to fill that void. It weakens America’s ability to shape global rules on trade, technology, and security. It also damages trust with long-standing allies in Europe and Asia. The US may find itself outside important conversations that affect its own economy and security. Rejoining these groups in the future could be difficult and costly.

What the List Means for the Future

This list is more than a policy document. It is a statement of principle for a potential second Trump term. It defines a world where the US participates selectively, not by default. The approach appeals to voters skeptical of globalization. It sets the stage for a more transactional and less cooperative era in international relations. The full effect on global stability and American standing will unfold over the next decade.